It also explains the comical "freeping" explanation for Clark's dominating showing in kos and mydd polls even though he knows that these polls cannot be "freeped" since you've got to have an account at these sites to vote.
It probably also explains the even funnier "its because Clark has a vibrant and large community that his supporters can freep polls" explaination as to why Clark's support really doesn't exist.
The truth is that while sometimes its fun for people like me and other Democrats to spend a few moments quickly disproving and debunking attacks on fellow Democrats from people like craverguy who seem to use the internet to find web things that were debunked and laughed at over a year ago but not able to use it to fact check before presenting an article that contains this gem "Matt Drudge really did his homework on this.".
The fact is that Clark voted for Reagan A QUARTER OF A CENTURY AGO. Great. Thank God that people like craverguy is relegated to being a blogger without a place in the world of reality and/our politics because "..over 25% of Reagan's total votes in 1980 were from Democrats.".
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Polls/reagan_ratings_poll_040607.html
I also get it that Clark has no voting record and therefore no proof he is a true "progressive". I guess I'm still waiting for someone to explain the negative of that conclusion to me. As soon as you can explain it to me could you possibly then call the de-facto spiriual leader of the liberal movement, Michael Moore? It seems that he also couldn't give a rat's ass and realized that is this "proof" that ends up killing us in general elections. Kerry had close to twenty years of proof -- how'd that turn out again?
The point I'm really trying to make here is that the Republican "revolution" was began under Reagan by this huge shift of Democrats -- Reagan Democrats as they are called today. We are witnessing this revolution beginning to crack at that seams and their party will begin shedding some of the same voters and even more moderate Republicans who will either look for a party they can identify with or simply remain Republican and stay at home in upcoming elections.
If a guy like Clark has to suffer through a relentless parade of ass clowns like craverguy troting out discredited Drudge-regurgitation after discredited Drudge-regurgitation after all he's done for the party once he left the military and was legaly allowed to speak out publicly on policy and politics where does this leave the Paul Hackett's of the Republican Party who come disilluisoned from the Iraq war and realizing how bankrupt their party is on solutions to problem s facing America?
The fact remains that Clark probably does more for the Democratic Party before lunch than most of us can do in a year and he shouldn't be attacked with the filth and bile that posters like craveguy trott out on a regular basis.
I'm not trying to censor anyone or even suggest craverguy should be banned. I'm actually hoping that stuff like this go to the front page so we all can recognize the grand ignorance that is on display with stuff like this and so that everyone sees what it looks like when a Democrat does the RNC's work for them in an effort to tear down one of your own to use that as a springboard for the candidate you support.
Craverguy is no different than Michelle Malkin and his diaries are no different than her stating that "Kerry's grenade wounds were self-inflicted".
Both are bat-shit crazy to the point of funny. Both are so wrong that everyone should see it for themselves.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 122 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
